Added: Adriana Fasching - Date: 07.02.2022 22:02 - Views: 36075 - Clicks: 835
Log in through your institution. This article started with questions about the position of women in criminal cases of rape, incest, and maltreatment in seventeenth-century Holland. Did contemporaries consider women who suffered from rape, incest, and maltreatment as victims of sexual and physical abuse? Furthermore, did honour play any role in these court cases?
The purpose of this study was to determine whether raped, assaulted, and maltreated women were viewed as victims by contemporaries. Criminal records show that judges, neighbours, and plaintiffs made ificant distinctions among these offenses. According to current views of sexual abuse, raped, assaulted, or maltreated women are without any doubt the victims of their perpetrators.
The modern perspective is that victim and perpetrator are prime subjects in such criminal cases. However, seventeenth-century lawyers, judges, plaintiffs, accused, and witnesses did not focus their attention on victim and perpetrator only. Egmond rightly pointed out that judges were also focused on the crime itself. This so-called 'offence-oriented' legal mentality implied that young girls were seen as accomplices or co-offenders in many cases of incest. Furthermore, criminal cases of rape, incest and maltreatment not only concerned the honour and reputation of the victim and the perpetrator, but also of neighbours and family members.
Indeed, although the latter did not stand trial or risk conviction, their good reputation was endangered as well. The Journal of Social History publishes articles and reviews in all fields of social history, regardless of period and region. It seeks particularly to promote work in new topics in social history, where it has established a distinguished record during its year existence.
New topics involve both the key facets of the field: exploring the histories and impacts of ordinary people and exploring aspects of the human experience beyond the more conventional historical staples. It also encourages discussions of key analytical and methodological issues, including comparative issues and issues of periodization. The Journal has also been active in bringing sociohistorical work in regional specializations, such as African or Latin American history, to a wider audience within the field. Periodically, the journal offers thematic issues that advance its basic purposes, including discussions of larger trajectories within the field itself.
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. OUP is the world's largest university press with the widest global presence. It currently publishes more than 6, new publications a year, has offices in around fifty countries, and employs more than 5, people worldwide. It has become familiar to millions through a diverse publishing program that includes scholarly works in all academic disciplines, bibles, music, school and college textbooks, business books, dictionaries and reference books, and academic journals.
Journal of Social History. Cite this Item. Read and download Log in through your school or library. Alternate access options. How does it work? Select the purchase option. Check out using a credit card or bank with PayPal. Read your article online and download the PDF from your or your . Why register for an ? Access supplemental materials and multimedia. Unlimited access to purchased articles.
Ability to save and export citations. Custom alerts when new content is added. Abstract This article started with questions about the position of women in criminal cases of rape, incest, and maltreatment in seventeenth-century Holland. Journal Information The Journal of Social History publishes articles and reviews in all fields of social history, regardless of period and region.Rotterdam sex woman
email: [email protected] - phone:(995) 121-8073 x 5551
Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal